Type of Activity: Grant
Grantee: Demand Progress Action
Amount: Up to $200,000 over two years
What is Demand Progress Action?
Demand Progress Action, a fiscally-sponsored project of the Sixteen Thirty Fund, is a charitable organization with two million affiliated activists focused on civil liberties and government reform-related issues. Demand Progress Action works to implement policy changes that keep the federal government accountable and support institutional reform.
Why do we think this project is a good idea?
At a time when few civil society organizations lobby on issues relating to congressional capacity, Demand Progress Action has emerged as a leader in helping Congress become a more resilient and functional 21st-century institution. Demand Progress Action helps Congress make sense of the complex set of impediments that hold back its ability to innovate and hamper its legislative capacity. A modernized and more functional Congress can develop stronger policy solutions to the challenges facing the American people.
Democracy Fund Voice will provide support to Demand Progress Action to advocate for congressional rules changes and legislation to strengthen congressional offices’ policymaking abilities and allow for technological innovation that will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of Congressional staff. With the help of our grant, Demand Progress Action will be able to track all hearings, markups, and legislation related to congressional capacity, deepen relationships with congressional leadership, lobby new measures supporting Congress’s ability to do its job, and build upon existing coalitions to support grassroots mobilization.
How is Voice supporting Demand Progress Action?
Democracy Fund Voice approved a two-year grant to Demand Progress Action in the amount of up to $200,000 for 2017-2018.
Type of Activity: Project Grant
Grantee: National States Geographic Information Council
Amount: Up to $300,000 in 2017
What is the GeoElections Project?
The GeoElections Project, lead by the National States Geographic Information Council (NSGIC), aims to improve geographic technology for better elections. The effort will tap state-level geospatial information officers, election directors, and other subject matter experts to champion the use of Geographical Information Systems (GIS) map technology. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are technologically advanced computer systems that use data to describe the earth’s surface and analyze the relationships between locations. Digital map representations of precinct boundaries are more transparent and easier to use for election administrative purposes. For this project, NSGIC will develop and promote best practices for replacing the current ‘street file’, a catalog of voter precinct assignments that requires correct addresses to be updated.
Why do we think this project is a good idea?
Democracy Fund Voice supports NSGIC’s efforts to facilitate the adoption of geographic information systems and related processes to enhance elections management and citizen engagement across the United States. By funding their project, we will be able to positively increase the quality of election administration for voters, candidates, and electoral management staff across the U.S. By providing additional states and localities with the information they require to utilize mapping technology, we believe this will lead to more accurate and accessible electoral databases and further innovate elections management best practices.
How is Voice supporting the project?
Democracy Fund Voice approved a grant to the National States Geographic Information Council in the amount of up to $300,000 to facilitate the adoption of geographic information systems and related processes to enhance elections management and citizen engagement across the United States.
Type of Activity: Advocacy Grant.
Grantee: Bipartisan Policy Center Advocacy Network, Inc.
Amount: Up to $150,000 in 2016 – 2017.
What is the Commission on Political Reform?
The Commission on Political Reform was launched by the sister organization of the Bipartisan Policy Center Advocacy Network (the Bipartisan Policy Center) in 2013 to investigate the causes and consequences of America’s partisan political divide and to advocate for specific reforms that will improve the political process in a polarized atmosphere. The Commission proposed 24 recommendations to strengthen the electoral process, the process by which Congress legislates and manages its own affairs, and the ability of Americans to plug into the nation’s civic life through public service. These reforms and solutions, championed by both ends of the political spectrum, include reinvigorating the central role of the congressional committee and reestablishing bipartisan interpersonal contact.
Why do we think this is a good idea?
We believe that bringing together a coalition of organizations to support bipartisan political reform can increase the likelihood and the impact of those reforms. BPCAN is uniquely positioned to develop and implement a strategy for this work because of its powerful voice in congressional bipartisan policy. They will promote an ongoing conversation about how to overcome political divides and make our government work better.
How is DFV supporting BPCAN?
Democracy Fund Voice approved a one year grant to the Bipartisan Policy Center Advocacy Network in the amount of up to $150,000 in 2016-2017 to facilitate coordination with other organizations advocating for recommendations of the Commission on Political Reform and other congressional reforms.